A program for special needs preschoolers, run through a school system to meet the government/ADA requirement to serve that population, underwent a program review for quality (to sum it up; details in the article). They were told to expand their program to include "general population" students.
As a result, they hired ECE teachers to run the new inclusive program. I know in my state, early childhood centers must have ECE degreed individuals in charge; not sure if this rule is a mandate for the school-run programs (or if it was a choice they made in this case). The special education teachers, no longer running the program, were kept on to run "pull-out" sessions as needed.
ECE is geared toward "play-based" learning. The kind of learning I think most of us use and which isn't generally structured enough for special needs children....which is why "general population" childcares tell/advise parents to seek out the school systems' 3-5 programs for their special needs children who aren't making it in our group care homes/centers.
I don't know how successful the center was prior to this (why did they call in outsiders to review it)....but I do know, from this article, that most parents who were happy before NOW seem completely unhappy with the new program, as it serves neither population well and has caused behavior and learning issues for the kids who most need the program. My feathers were a little ruffled by the phrase "glorified daycare".....but I do see her frustrated point. Her child needed more than play-based, group care and she thought her child was getting it.
I am so annoyed at the government's continued push to grow our children in cookie cutter factories. I know it's a well-covered topic here, but this is another fine example.
As a result, they hired ECE teachers to run the new inclusive program. I know in my state, early childhood centers must have ECE degreed individuals in charge; not sure if this rule is a mandate for the school-run programs (or if it was a choice they made in this case). The special education teachers, no longer running the program, were kept on to run "pull-out" sessions as needed.
ECE is geared toward "play-based" learning. The kind of learning I think most of us use and which isn't generally structured enough for special needs children....which is why "general population" childcares tell/advise parents to seek out the school systems' 3-5 programs for their special needs children who aren't making it in our group care homes/centers.
I don't know how successful the center was prior to this (why did they call in outsiders to review it)....but I do know, from this article, that most parents who were happy before NOW seem completely unhappy with the new program, as it serves neither population well and has caused behavior and learning issues for the kids who most need the program. My feathers were a little ruffled by the phrase "glorified daycare".....but I do see her frustrated point. Her child needed more than play-based, group care and she thought her child was getting it.
I am so annoyed at the government's continued push to grow our children in cookie cutter factories. I know it's a well-covered topic here, but this is another fine example.
Comment