- "Apartments aren’t the only type of housing snarled by zoning. In cities, many zoning codes ban single-room occupancies (SROs)—better known as boarding or rooming houses—in which residents rent a furnished private bedroom with a shared kitchen and bathroom. Where they’re allowed, SROs serve as a housing safety net, providing exceptionally affordable accommodations to low-income singles. In the postwar period, however, many cities—including New York—modified their zoning to ban them."
- "Manufactured homes— trailers- or mobile homes—once filled a similar niche in suburban and rural communities. Yet, as with SROs, many zoning codes ban manufactured housing."
- "federal-tax policy encouraged homeowners to treat their house as an investment"
- "need planners to facilitate subsidized housing, protect natural areas, and map out safe streets and parks"
- - https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/ar...ouston/661289/
If they take away the incentives for private home ownership, why would anyone bother owning or paying taxes for the "privilege"? We can all just do the minimum amount of effort in life and live in subsidized housing, right?? Oh, wait, what taxpayers will pay for it, then? There has to be a place for everything. Not all housing should be shoved into subdivisions. People who have already lived in apartments, trailers, and worked their way out, for many years, deserve the reward of peace and quiet. Take that away and they will just leave.
We all know what happens to areas when all the taxpayers leave.
Comment